The identification and the quantitative determination of loratadine by the HPLC method

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24959/ophcj.21.240778

Keywords:

loratadine, identification, quantitative determination, high-performance liquid chromatography

Abstract

Aim. To develop the unified method of the HPLC analysis of loratadine, which can allow obtaining reliable and reproducible results of the studies of pharmaceuticals and biological matrices for monitoring the treatment effectiveness.
Materials and methods. The HPLC analysis was performed on a “Milichrome A-02” microcolumn liquid chromatograph under the following conditions: a reversed-phase variant, 2 × 75 mm column filled with a non-polar sorbent Prontosil 120-5 C18 AQ, 5 μm; the mobile phase in the mode of a linear gradient – from eluent А (5 % of acetonitrile and 95  % of a buffer solution) to eluent B (100 % of acetonitrile) for 40 min. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 100 μL/min; the injection volume was 4 μL. The multichannel detection of the substance
was carried out using an UV-detector at 210, 220, 230, 240, 250, 260, 280 and 300 nm; the optimal value of the column temperature was 37 – 40 °С, and the pump pressure was 2.8 – 3.2 MPa.
Results and discussion. As a result of the studies performed, the retention parameters of loratadine and spectral relationships were determined using the unified HPLC method. This made it possible to include the results obtained in the database for the identification of antihistamines in the therapeutic monitoring of the treatment with an individual drug or in the complex treatment of allergic reactions. The development of the quantitative determination
of loratadine by HPLC on model solutions using various concentrations of the drug was carried out. The content of loratadine was determined by the equation S = 1.14 × 10-3C – 0.50 × 10-4; the correlation coefficient was 0.9998. It was found that the relative standard deviation RSD did not exceed 0.93 % when analyzing loratadine in the model solutions by HPLC.
Conclusions. The identification and the quantitative determination of loratadine by the unified HPLC method have been conducted. The method allows obtaining reliable and reproducible research results. The results of the studies can be recommended for implementation in the practice of forensic bureaus, toxicological centers, and clinical laboratories.

Supporting Agency

  • The work is a part of the researches of the National University of Pharmacy on the topic “Organic synthesis and analysis of biologically active compounds, drug development on the basis of synthetic substances” (the state registration No. 01144000943; the research period of 2019  –  2024)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Mashkovskiy, M. D. Lekarstvennye sredstva [Medicines, in Russian], 16th ed.; Novaya Volna: Moscow, 2012.
  2. Moffat, A. C.; Osselton, M. D.; Widdop, B. Clarke´s Analysis of Drugs and Poisons in Pharmaceuticals, Body Fluids and Postmortem Material, 4th ed.; Pharmaceutical Press: London, 2011.
  3. Matterne, U.; Böhmer, M. M.; Weisshaar, E.; Jupiter, A.; Carter, B.; Apfelbacher, C. J. Oral H1 antihistamines as ‘add-on’ therapy to topical treatment for eczema. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2019, 1. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012167.pub2.
  4. Fritz, I.; Wagner, P.; Bottai, M.; Eriksson, H.; Ingvar, C.; Krakowski, I.; Nielsen, K.; Olsson, H. Desloratadine and loratadine use associated with improved melanoma survival. Allergy 2020, 75 (8), 2096 – 2099. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.14273.
  5. Yamprasert, R.; Chanvimalueng, W.; Mukkasombut, N.; Itharat, A. Ginger extract versus Loratadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies 2020, 20 (1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-020-2875-z.
  6. Nayak, A. S.; Berger, W. E.; LaForce, C. F.; Urdaneta, E. R.; Patel, M. K.; Franklin, K. B.; Wu, M.-M. Randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetirizine and loratadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy and Asthma Proceedings 2017, 38 (3), 222 – 230. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2017.38.4050.
  7. Cobb, D. B.; Watson, W. A.; Fernández, M. C. High-dose loratadine exposure in a six-year-old child. Veterinary and human toxicology 2001, 43 (3), 163 – 164.
  8. Motola, D.; Donati, M.; Biagi, C.; Calamelli, E.; Cipriani, F.; Melis, M.; Monaco, L.; Vaccheri, A.; Ricci, G. Safety profile of H1-antihistamines in pediatrics: an analysis based on data from VigiBase. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 2017, 26 (10), 1164 – 1171. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4246.
  9. Kanthiah, S.; Kannappan, V. D-Optimal mixture design optimization of an HPLC method for simultaneous determination of commonly used antihistaminic parent molecules and their active metabolites in human serum and urine. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2017, 31 (8), e3932. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.3932.
  10. Kunicki, P. K. Determination of loratadine in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatographic method with ultraviolet detection. Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences and Applications 2001, 755 (1), 331 – 335. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00053-6.
  11. Li, W.; Doherty, J.; Moench, P.; Flarakos, J.; Tse, F. L. LC-MS/MS bioanalysis of loratadine (Claritin) in dried blood spot (DBS) samples collected by subjects in a clinical research study. Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences 2015, 983 – 984, 117 – 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2014.12.033.
  12. Pisareva, N. A.; Novikov, O. O.; Pisarev, D. I.; Zhilyakova, E. T.; Sabelnikova, N. N. Razrabotka metodik kolichestvennogo opredeleniya loratadina v substantsii [Development of the method for quantitative determination of loratadine in a substance, in Russian]. Belgorod State University Scientific bulletin. Medicine. Pharmacy 2012, 22, 161 – 164.
  13. Polyak, O. B.; Bondar, V. S. Rozrobka metodiv identyfikatsii loratadynu [The elaboration of methods for loratadine identification, in Ukrainian]. News of Pharmacy 2003, 4 (36), 40 – 44.
  14. European Pharmacopoeia, 6th Ed.; Euroрean Department for the Quality of Medicines: Strasbourg, 2008, 2286 – 2288.
  15. Baram, G. I. Portable liquid chromatograph for mobile laboratories I. Aims. J. Chromatogr. A 1996, 728 (1), 387 – 399. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9673(95)01271-0.
  16. Baram, G. I. Hromatograf “Milihrom A-02”. Opredelenie veshchestv s primeneniem baz dannyh “VEZhKh-UF” [Chromatograph “Milichrom A-02”. Determination of substances using databases “HPLC-UV”, in Russian] https://new.econova.ru/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/publication_collections_2.pdf (accessed Aug 10, 2021).
  17. Derzhavna farmakopeia Ukrainy, 1 vydannia, dopovnennia 2 [The State Pharmacopoeia of Ukraine, 1st ed., suppl. 2, in Ukrainian]; State Enterprise “Ukrainian Scientific Pharmacopoeial Center for Quality of Medicines”: Kharkiv, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2021-10-20

How to Cite

(1)
Mamina, O. O.; Kabachny, V. I.; Bondarenko, N. Y.; Lozova, O. V. The Identification and the Quantitative Determination of Loratadine by the HPLC Method. J. Org. Pharm. Chem. 2021, 19, 40-46.

Issue

Section

Original Researches