Enzymatic resolution of 2-cycloalkylethanols
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24959/ophcj.14.823Keywords:
2-cycloalkylethanol, enzymatic catalysis, enantioselectivity, Burkholderia Cepacia Lipase, Candida Antarctica Lipase BAbstract
Kinetic enzymatic resolution is a convenient modern method for obtaining optically pure compounds. The behaviour of 2-cyclopropyl- and 2-cyclobutyl methylcarbinols under conditions of the biocatalytic acylation reaction has been investigated. The comparative analysis of efficiency of enzymes of Burkholderia Cepacia Lipase (BCL) and Candida Antarctica Lipase B (CAL-B) in the reactions of acylation in the presence of vinyl acetate and hydrolysis in the buffer solution has been carried out. The progress of the reaction was monitored by 1H-NMR. It has been found that in 50% conversion the selectivity of enzymatic acylation of both 2-cycloalkylethanols in the presence of BCL is low and increases with increasing the cycle ring due to the small difference in size between alkyl substituents at the chiral carbon atom. By using biocatalysis (2-cyclopropyl) – and 2-cyclobutylethanols in an optically pure (ee ≥ 95%) form have been synthesized. The comparison of the results obtained with the literature data shows that reactions of enzymatic acylation and deacylation proceed in accordance with Kazlauskas rule stating the predominant acylation of (R)-enantiomer and deacylation of (R)-acetate. To study the possibilities of application of the compounds obtained as building blocks the enantioselective synthesis of both enantiomers of (2-cyclobutyl)ethylamine has been conducted using Mitsunobu reaction with hydrazoic acid at the key stage. The optical purity of the compounds studied has been determined by analyzing the 19F-NMR spectra of their derivatives obtained as a result of interaction with Mosher’s acid chloride.
Downloads
References
- Naumann K. Synthetic Pyrethroid Insecticides: Structure and Properties. Chemistry of Plant Protection. Heidelberg: Springer, 1990, Vol. 4, p.241.
- Liu H., Huang J., Wang J., Wang M., Liu M., Wang B., Guo H., Lu Y. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2014, Vol. 86, pp.628-638.
- Vianello P., Botrugno O. A., Cappa A., Ciossani G., Dessanti P., Mai A., Mattevi A., Meroni G., Minucci S., Thaler F., Tortorici M., Trifiró P., Valente S., Villa M., Varasi M., Mercurio C. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 2014, Vol. 86, pp.352-363.
- Lim J., Taoka B., Otte R. D., Spencer K., Dinsmore C. J., Altman M. D., Chan G., Rosenstein C., Sharma S., Su H.-P., Szewczak A. A., Xu L., Yin H., Zugay-Murphy J., Marshall C. G., Young J. R. J. Med. Chem., 2011, Vol. 54, pp.7334-7349.
- Jaime-Figueroa S., De Vicente J., Hermann J., Jahangir A., Jin S., Kuglstatter A., Lynch S. M., Menke J., Niu L., Patel V., Shao A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2013, Vol. 23, pp.2522-2526.
- Li J., Smith D., Krishnananthan S., Hartz R. A., Dasgupta B., Ahuja V., Schmitz W. D., Bronson J. J., Mathur A., Barrish J. C., Chen B.-C. Org. Process Res. Dev., 2012, Vol. 16, pp.156-159.
- Park H. S., Lee H. Y., Kim Y. H., Park J. K., Zvartau E. E., Lee H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2006, Vol. 16, pp.3609-3613.
- Pat. WO 141761 (2010) // http://patentscope.wipo.int
- Vinogradov M. G., Kurilov D. V., Chel’tsova G. V., Ferapontov V. A., Heise G. L. Mendeleev Commun., 2003, Vol. 13, pp.124-125.
- Li W., Sun X., Zhou L., Hou G., Yu. S., Zhang X. J. Org. Chem., 2009, Vol. 74, pp.1397-1399.
- Eagon S., Kim J., Singaram B. Synthesis, 2008, №23, pp.3874-3876.
- César V., Bellemin-Laponnaz S., Wadepohl H., Gade L. H. Chem. Eur. J., 2005, Vol. 11, pp.2862-2873.
- Bradshaw C. W., Hummel W., Wong C.-H. J. Org. Chem., 1992, Vol. 57, pp.1532-1536.
- Matsuda T., Nakajima Y., Harada T., Nakamura K. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2002, Vol. 13, pp.971-974.
- Ghanem A., Aboul-Enein H. Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2004, Vol. 15, pp.3331-3351.
- Kucher O. V., Kolodyazhnaya A. O., Smolii O. B., Boiko A. I., Kubyshkin V. S., Mykhailyuk P. K., Tolmachev A. A. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 2014, Vol. 25, pp.563-567.
- Kazlauskas R. J., Weissfloch A. N. E., Rappaport A. T., Cuccia L. A. J. Org. Chem. 1991, Vol. 56, pp.2656-2665.
- Dale J. A., Mosher H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1973, Vol. 95, pp.512-519.
- Mitsunobu O. Synthesis, 2008, №1, pp.1-28.
- Pat. WO 100065 (2014) // http://patentscope.wipo.int
- Pietta P. G. J. Nat. Prod., 2000, Vol. 63, pp.1035-1042.
- Nijveldt R. J., van Nood E., van Hoorn D. E. C., Boelens P. G., van Norren K., van Leeuwen P. A. M., Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 2001, Vol. 74, pp.418-425.
- Maclnnes J., Nonhebel D. C., Orszulik S. T., Suckling C. J., Wrigglesworth R. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. I, 1983, Vol. 11, pp.2771-2776.
- Rieke R. D., Wehmeyer R. M., Wu T.-C., Ebert G. W. Tetrahedron, 1989, Vol. 45, pp.443-454.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2014 National University of Pharmacy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors publishing their works in the Journal of Organic and Pharmaceutical Chemistry agree with the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of the first publication of the work under Creative Commons Attribution License allowing everyone to distribute and re-use the published material if proper citation of the original publication is given.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) providing proper citation of the original publication.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g. in institutional repositories or on authors’ personal websites) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).